Sorbetto by Colette

Sorbetto by Colette

The pattern for Sorbetto, a sleeveless top, is a free download from Seamwork. You can get yours here.

There are three views: a sleeveless top, a longer sleeveless top and a top with short sleeves:Sorbetto by Colette

I thought it would be great to have a basic blouse pattern and like the simplicity of this one.

First I made version 1 in a woven rayon print, and here’s the result:Sorbetto by Colette sewn by Deborah Cooke

This top was easy to sew and fairly quick to make. It fits me reasonably well. (The bust dart is in the right place – kind of a surprise since I’ve been lowering bust darts on everything – so if your girls are perky, you might want to double-check its location before you cut.) You can see that the front pleat kind of disappears when you use a print fabric.

I don’t love the top, though, and had to think about that. Why does it feel frumpy?

I went back and looked at the pattern pictures from the Colette website. The orange top actually looks a bit snug at the underarm on the model and the top definitely is more narrow in the shoulders than mine, especially across the back. I bound the seams instead of turning under the seam allowance, but that only adds 1/4″. The shoulders on my blouse are too wide, even for Nell.

Sorbetto by Colette Sorbetto by Colette

Cutting for my bust size and ending up with a top that’s too wide in the shoulders is a familiar issue for me. It isn’t a huge deal with a sleeveless blouse, but means I don’t want to make the version with sleeves until I work that out. The top also catches me a bit across the hips when I sit down, which means it needs to be either wider at the hem or shorter overall.

One issue at a time. I decided to try a version with a shirt tail hem. I chose another woven rayon print from my stash. Both of these rayon prints came from Fabricland, and I think they were both included in a huge feature of rayon prints at $5/m last year. I love woven rayon prints and bought a bunch of yardage then. I’ve cut a dress out of each of these prints, so cut these blouses from the remnants, using the rayon as muslin. This rayon, though, is much softer than the navy one, which is more crisp, and wow, what a difference that made. There is nothing that can make you regret a million miles of bias binding like a soft, floaty fabric! After much gnashing of teeth, here’s the result:Sorbetto by Colette sewn by Deborah Cooke

It turns out that I don’t love the shirt tail hem, plus I had some issues getting it right at the side seams – because I’d felled the seams. One side is great; the other, not so much. (grrrr.) There is a tech article in this month’s Threads magazine about that very challenge, so I’ll have a look and learn.

Oops a one way designThis is a top of many errors – I was sure the print wasn’t a one-way design but I was only looking at the wider stripes. Look how the narrow ones between those wider ones alternate. Oops. It IS a one-way design, but I had to invert the back to cut it out of the remnant.

I also inverted the front pleat by mistake. (No pix. I forgot.) And I originally sewed the front pleat as a tuck at the neck and didn’t sew it down. This made a floaty top, but also made me look a LOT more buxom than I am by creating a deep shadow at center-front between the girls. (You could do that on purpose if you wanted to look more curvy.)

That look was a non-starter for me. I took the neck apart, fixed the direction of the pleat and sewed it down for just 8″, leaving the lower part of it open. This was mostly because I didn’t want to re-do the hem, but actually, it works well with the fabric this way.

In comparing the two test tops, I much prefer the crisper rayon. The shoulders are still too wide, but I didn’t want to just trim them back because the neckline is a bit wide, too. (That explains the frump factor.) Instead, I pinned in the center back seam, as if I’d trimmed off 3/4″ and tried it on (to make sure it would go over my head). It did and fits much better through the neck. I don’t want to redo that bias binding, but that gave me a modification for future tops.

Sorbetto by Colette sewn by Deborah Cooke in Kaffe Fassett Exotic StripeI went back to my pattern and modified it. I cut an inch off the hem, cut 3/4″ off the center back of the back pattern piece, and re-angled the side seams so that they’re 3/8″ wider at the hem. The additions to the side seams make up the 1.5″ taken out of the center-back so the hem is the same finished width.

Then I cut another Sorbetto in Kaffe Fassett cotton in one of his yarn-dyed stripe fabrics. I hemmed this one with self-bias because I thought it needed some structure at the hem to hang properly. It also would be better in a crisper fabric than the Exotic Stripe, but here it is!

I’m pleased with this version. 🙂 And now, I have a pattern to make LOTS of quick summer tops in a hurry. Ha.

Knitting the Slippery Slope Scarf/Stole in Other Yarns

The Slippery Slope Scarf by Deborah Cooke knitted by Deborah CookeThis post is about modifying the Slippery Slope Shawl.

If you use thick yarn, you’ll get quick results and a different look. You could make an afghan with this stitch pattern, for example, and it would be wonderful. You could also do this scarf in very fine lace weight yarn, and it would be lovely too. Either way, you’ll have to figure out your own stitch counts.

Here’s how I figured out mine for the instructions given yesterday.

1/ The ball band is your friend.

Yarn always has a ball band, which includes a bunch of useful information. Have a look at yours. My ball band says that each ball of the Diamond Fancy Free is 50g in weight and 206 m in length. (Be warned that I flip between meters and yards, as the difference isn’t enough to really matter.) I had three skeins, so I had 618 m of yarn.

The ball band says that on needles between 2.5mm and 3.5mm, I should get 30 stitches to 10cm (which is a whole lot like 4″). That means 7.5 sts to the inch. That’s a big range in needle sizes though. I know my own knitting and would guesstimate that on 3.5mm needles, I’ll get more like 6 stitches to the inch.

When choosing a needle size for knitting lace, go a bit bigger than you would otherwise (or than the ball band recommends). For socks, for example, I always use a 2.5 or even a 2.25 mm needle. For lace with the same yarn, I’ll use 3.5mm. The spider’s web shawl I showed you a while back was knit on 4.5mm needles, and the Noro Silk Garden Sock yarn is both thinner and thicker than this Fancy Free. Lace needs a fluid fabric to show it off, so go up a size or even two sizes from what you’d expect to use with that yarn. (And yes, when in doubt, swatch.)

So, if I’m going to get 6 stitches per inch and I want to make a wide scarf that’s about 12″ wide, then I’ll need (6 x 12) 72 stitches. By happy coincidence, that’s a multiple of 8. Use the same calculation for your yarn, then round up or down from your calculated result to get a multiple of 8 for this scarf/stole.

2/ The 7th Row Sneaky Trick

If you want to use up all of your yarn and make your scarf/stole as long as possible, then you need to know how much yarn it takes to knit a row. Before you knit the 7th row of the garter stitch border, mark one yard (or one meter) on the yarn that you’ll knit. Measure right from your needle – where the yarn comes from the last stitch on the 6th row – and tie a slip knot at the 1 yard point. Make it loose enough that you can pull it out, but tight enough that it stays put. Then knit the row.

If you have to knit past the slip knot, then measure another yard/meter from that point, remove the first slip knot and knit on.

When you get to the end of the row, calculate how much yarn it took you to knit that row. For example, if you didn’t reach the knot, measure back from the knot and subtract – a knot at 36″ with 4″ left means it took you 32″ to knit the row. For my wide scarf, it took 46″ to knit a row.

This is your magic number. Multiple this magic number by 10. This distance is how much yarn you must leave to knit the end border on the shawl. My 46″ is a whole lot like 117 cm – since metric is easier to multiply, I rounded that up to 120 cm or 1.2 m. So, I will need 1.2m x 10 = 12m to finish the last garter stitch border on my shawl.

If you are compulsive (like yours truly) measure that point from the other end of your yarn (or from the last end of the last ball) and put a slip knot there. This slip knot marks the very latest point at which you can begin the garter stitch border at the other end of the scarf/shawl. Now you have no stress about running out of yarn. Isn’t that fun?

3/ How big?

The second part of this sneaky trick is even better – you can ballpark the finished length of your shawl with this number. I know, for example, that I need 1.2 m per row and I know that I have 618 m of yarn in total. So, I can calculate that I’ll be able to knit (618 divided by 1.2) 515 rows in total. A peek back at my ball band revealed that I should get 10 rows per inch – so the finished length of my scarf will be at least 51.5″.

In reality, since I’m using larger needles, I suspected I’d get more like 8 rows per inch, which would give me a finished length of 64″ or so. (That’s exactly what I am getting.) I’m good with scarves and shawls being bigger – what I hate is when they’re too small. So, consider the ball band calculation to be a worst case (or smallest case) scenario. If you’re good with it, knit on. If not, rip back those couple of rows and try a different number of cast on stitches.

4/ Math Geek Bonus Round

Deep in my heart, I am a math geek. I loved math in high school, loved it so much that I was excited when a guidance counsellor told me I could have a job that involved doing math all the time. Wow! What kind of a job would that be? He told me I could be an actuary, or a high school math teacher. The prospect of being an actuary did not make this girl’s heart go pitapat, and neither did the idea of facing a room full of hostile teenagers every day for the rest of my life. So, I wandered off and ultimately became a writer instead.

If I’d had a more imaginative guidance counsellor – maybe one who wasn’t so floored by the idea of a girl liking math – I could have been off calculating the area inside parabolas every day, or figuring missile trajectories, or constructing elaborate proofs. There you go. Be careful what you tell teenagers – they might believe you.

So, my inner math geek loves this bit. When I finished knitting one whole skein of yarn, I counted up my rows and refined my 1.17m/row ballpark estimate. It turned out that I got 162 rows out of that skein. With 72 stitches per row, there were 11,664 stitches in that skein of yarn. (Who knew?) But if I know that I can get that many stitches on that size needles, then I can figure out how many rows I’ll get from each skein with 56 stitches or with 88 stitches. Multiplied by the number of skeins, that tells me how long each piece will be, and how many repeats of the pattern I’ll get. And that’s how I figured out the instructions for the other two sizes of the scarf without actually knitting them.

Ha.
Don’t you feel empowered? Go forth and knit!